How Do We Know Jesus Decended Into Hell and Rose Again

If you'd similar a PDF copy of this weblog post delivered to your electronic mail inbox, click hither.

What is the all-time proof that God exists?

For hundreds of years, people from all walks of life accept debated whether God exists, or if He'southward just a fictional graphic symbol.

I used to think that God existed, then I changed my mind to thinking that He doesn't be, and at present I know that He does exist.

When I posted my testimony about how I went from beingness a Christian, to being an atheist, and and then became a Christian again, I had a few atheists who privately messaged me to ask about my story.

At present I'thou happy to share that I've fabricated some new atheist friends, and we're talking back and forth most whether in that location is enough proof that God exists.

Then in this article, I'm going to share with you lot my opinion on what is the best proof that God exists.

This article is going to be the logical argument for the being God.

At a later on time, I'll be sharing my opinion on what is the all-time scientific proof that supports the existence of God.

While I won't be using the Bible to prove the beingness of God, it would be beneficial to know that the Bible says that God has given u.s.a. two witnesses so nosotros can know that there is a God.

one.  Witness #1 – Creation

By taking a wait at the world around us, nosotros can see that information technology was designed and created by a supreme Beingness.

"For ever since the world was created, people accept seen the globe and sky. Through everything God fabricated, they tin can clearly see his invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature. And so they have no excuse for not knowing God."

– Romans one:20, New Living Translation

two.  Witness #2 – Censor

The fact that there are universal morals that we all share show that nosotros all accept a censor, and that God is the 1 who wrote what is right and wrong in our hearts.

"They demonstrate that God'south law is written in their hearts, for their own censor and thoughts either accuse them or tell them they are doing right.  And this is the message I proclaim—that the day is coming when God, through Christ Jesus, volition guess everyone's hole-and-corner life."

– Romans 2:xv-16, New Living Translation

In this commodity, I'll merely be writing virtually creation.

By reading this article you lot'll notice out things similar:

• What is the single logical statement for the existence of God that cannot be logically disproven
• Why atheists have a problem with this argument and how I reply them
• What are the issues with the multiverse and 1000-theory
• What are the problems with the theories proposed by Stephen Hawking and Lawrence Krauss for a universe that was created from nothing
• Why the Christian God stands out amongst all the other gods as the one that created the universe

If you'd like a PDF copy of this blog post delivered to your email inbox, click hither.

Merely First, Why Should You Read About the Existence of God

The question of God's existence is important to reply

If yous're on the contend about whether God exists or not, then I believe that answering this question is the single nearly important question of your life.

Why?

The implications of whether God exists or not are HUGE:

1.  It affects your view of life here on globe

two.  Information technology determines how you alive your life

3.  Information technology affects your purpose in life and your desitny

4.  It determines the source of your morality

5.  If there's an alternate dimension where there is a real heaven and a real hell, and then y'all'll want to make sure that y'all choose heaven.

In My Opinion, the Best Proof That God Exists is This

The cosmological argument is an argument for the being of God that says that God is the Get-go Cause that created the universe (source: Wikipedia).

It'south also known equally the statement from beginning cause, the causal argument, or the argument from beingness.

The argument below is a variant of the cosmological argument, and it states:

1. Premise 1 – Something exists
2. Premise 2 – Nothing cannot create something
3. Decision – Something must have always existed

Caption of the Cosmological Argument

ane.  Something Exists The is a very basic premise that almost everyone agrees on.

In our case, that something is the universe. There are some people who would argue that we don't know if we, or annihilation else for that matter, really does exist.

These people argue that maybe the life that we're living now is non real. Perhaps we're plugged into a machine somewhere, and dreaming up the life that we are living, like as in, The Matrix (motion-picture show).

This isn't the but caption that these people give for an alternating reality.

Supporters of this argument will put forth other explanations for the possibility of life not being real, and for living in a dream-land.

This idea isn't anything new, and has been effectually for hundreds of years.

I don't believe this theory to be truthful, and I believe in the counter-statement that was given past Descartes.

René Descartes, was a French philosopher and mathematician, who made the statement, "Cogito ergo sum," which is translated, "I remember, therefore I am."

This ways that thinking about one's existence is proof of the beingness of oneself.

You tin can read more nearly Descartes' cogito ergo sum argument on Wikipedia if you lot're interested.

2.  Nothing Cannot Create Something

The definition of null is no-matter.  Information technology isn't anything, and it doesn't accept the power to practise anything.

Nothing can also be defined as the state of not-being.

3.  Something Must Take E'er Existed

Nosotros know that at that place must have been something that has always existed in gild to bring the thing that now exists (the universe), into existence.

If we say this isn't true, and so we're likewise saying that it's possible for the universe to have come up from zippo, and we know this is impossible because of premise number 2.

Anything that has come up into existence must have a cause.

Then What is the Something That Must Have Ever Existed?

At that place are but two options if we're following the logic given in the cosmological argument.

• Either the universe has always existed or
• Something exterior the universe has e'er existed

Scientific evidence shows united states of america that the universe hasn't always existed.

Hither are some of the evidences that support that the universe did begin at a certain point of time:

1.  The Second Law of Thermodynamics

The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that the corporeality of usable energy in a closed organisation, similar in the example of the universe, is decreasing.

In other words, the amount of usable energy is dying out just like the batteries die in your flashlight.

If a closed arrangement similar the universe is in fact running out of energy, and so the universe tin can't exist eternal because a finite amount of energy could never have brought the universe through an eternity of time.

2.  The Universe is Expanding

In 1929, Edwin Hubble, made a discovery that the universe is expanding.

Once scientists understood that the universe was expanding, they realized that information technology would have been smaller in the past.

At some signal historically, the entire universe would take been a single point.

This indicate is what many people refer to as the Big Bang, which is the point when our universe began to exist.

3.  The Cosmic Background Radiation

Physics.org describes the Cosmic Groundwork Radiations as, "The left-over heat from the fireball of the Big Bang in which the Universe was born 13.7 billion years ago."

While the age of the earth is speculation by scientists, most do concur that the Cosmic Background Radiations does point to a finite universe that has a specific age.

So to recap, here's the cosmological argument which offers proof for the existence of God:

• Something exists (the universe)
• Nothing can't create something
• Therefore, something must accept ever existed in gild to cause the universe into existence
• The universe didn't always exist
• Therefore, something outside of the universe must have always existed

Why God is the Eternal Something (or rather Someone) That Caused the Universe into Existence

We don't need to rely on the Bible or on any religion to show that God is the eternal Being who created this universe.

Why?

We tin can conclude some things nearly the Creator of this universe by looking at the world effectually us.

When we examine the universe, we tin conclude that the Creator must be:

• Cocky-real
• Timeless
• Not-spatial (exists outside of time, space, and matter)
• Infinitely powerful because He created this vast thing we phone call the universe
• Supremely intelligent because He created the universe with immaculate precision
• Personal because He chose to catechumen a state of nothingness into the time-space-material universe (an impersonal strength has no ability to make choices)

When we take a expect at all of these characteristics, we see that they are the characteristics that are attributed to God.

Who Created God?

Atheists ordinarily say that if we follow the logic in the argument, then God must have had a creator as well.

I used to bring upward this objection to those who believed in God when I was an atheist.

However, the cosmological argument only states that everything that came into existence must have a crusade.

God didn't come into existence, He always was, is, and volition forever be.

The cosmological argument points to the start cause of the universe as Someone that has always existed.

That is a office of the statement.

The argument points that at that place must be something that did not have a cause.

Simply Wait, Maybe that Eternal Creator isn't God

Most atheists, if they concede that yes, there must be an eternal first crusade to the universe, then they'll say that we don't know what it is.

They'll says that science is still making new discoveries every day.

Therefore, they'll say that there could be other life forms out there that we don't know near yet, and maybe they are the ones that created the universe.

God vs. Aliens (other life forms)

The bottom line is that there is no physical prove that other life forms be.

You can tell me about the climate of Mars, or nearly Kepler-186f, and I'll once again say that there'south noconcrete evidence that other life forms be on those planets or anywhere else.

On the other hand, the evidence for the Christian God is much more concrete.

Why?

When nosotros look at how Christianity spread after the death and resurrection of Jesus, nosotros notice something that's both fascinating and unique.

This unique thing is that the apostles and early followers of Jesus weren't simply martyred for their organized religion, nearly of them were tortured first earlier they were killed.

This is documented in historical books that are written by authors outside of the Bible, authors such as Josephus and Tertullian.

The reason that the torture and death of the first followers of Jesus is and then significant, is considering they were tortured for saying that they had witnessed the risen Christ.

You might be thinking, "So what? Hundreds of people die for their beliefs everyday."

Just hold on for a just a infinitesimal, there's a huge difference.

The first followers of Jesus were tortured and martyred for saying that they saw Jesus resurrected

Hundreds of people die everyday because they believe that their religion is true.

However, nobody is willing to dice for a false testimony.

Did you lot notice the difference between these two?

If the apostles and early on Christians were lying virtually seeing the risen Christ, then as before long equally they would've experienced persecution and torture, then surely they would have changed their imitation testimony.

They would take said, "Deplorable, nosotros're lying about seeing the risen Christ.  Delight stop torturing usa and allow us become."

But none of them withdrew their testimonies, they were tortured until death, and they maintained that they had seen the resurrected Jesus.

Why would and then many people exist willing to do die for a false testimony?

Do y'all know anyone that'south willing to dice for giving a false testimony in court?

The respond is no.

That'south why this is ane of the most compelling evidences for Christianity being an accurate belief system.

Wait, a Universe From Nada is Possible, Says Stephen Hawking, Lawrence Krauss and Others

Sometimes atheists will bring up M-theory, or the multiverse, citing that it'southward possible for a universe to be created from aught.

M-theory is a theory that says that there's either an space or finite amount of universes.

Since there are and then many universes, and then 1 of them must be fine-tuned to sustain life.

In Stephen Hawking'southward book, The Chiliad Pattern, Hawking Writes, "Because at that place is a police force of gravity, the universe can and will create itself out of nothing."

Both Hawking and Lawrence Krauss propose that it's theoretically possible for the universe to have come from nothing using Yard-theory, string theory, and breakthrough physics to practise away with God as being the creator.

However, in that location are major flaws to M-theory, and there are a number of respected physicists who indicate out these flaws.

Some physicists have gone as far equally saying that M-theory isn't even a science, it's a pseudoscience.

Problems With M-Theory and a Multiverse

1.  M-theory requires the law of gravity and gravity is not "nothing."  Information technology'southward "something."

Any supporters of M-theory need to modify the definition of the give-and-take "nothing" to support their view.

Nix is no-thing, it's the state of non-being.

Scientific laws describe what happens under certain atmospheric condition and they demand something to work on.

You tin can be sure that gravity isn't nothing, it's something.

2.  At that place is no show for a multiverse existing.

There isn't much to be said here.  If there was testify to back up this theory, there wouldn't be such a debate.

There is no observable evidence for an space, or even a finite number of universes existing.

3.  When physicists talk about "nothing", they are talking about a quantum vacuum.  Only in that location's a trouble.

A quantum vacuum is not nada.

A quantum vacuum does have the backdrop of "something" as Dr. Alexander Vilenkin points out in this video.

If yous're interested in reading more near Thou-theory, the multiverse, and related topics, I recommend you check out this article by Focus.org, or this article by Professor John Lennox.

What Would the Universe Look like without God?

A universe without God wouldn't be, and you wouldn't be either if there was no God.

This is my conventionalities and personal conviction.

I used to think otherwise when I was an atheist, but now, I have peace knowing that I have a relationship with God, the creator of sky and earth.

I shared with you my beliefs and I'd beloved to hear about yours.

Exercise you believe in God? Why or why not?

If you'd like a PDF copy of this blog post delivered to your electronic mail inbox, click here.

ornelasandshoughter.blogspot.com

Source: https://notashamedofthegospel.com/apologetics/proof-that-god-exists/

Share this post